On 10 May 2020, clashes broke out between Chinese and Indian troops in Nathu La, Sikkim, injuring 11 soldiers. [121] [122] [123] After the skirmishes in Sikkim, tensions between the two Ladakh countries escalated with the formation of troops in several places. [124] On the night of 15-16 June, 20 Indian soldiers and an unknown number of PLA soldiers were killed. [125] China has reinforced its troops near the Indian border with Tibet, Chinese media reported. [126] Bilateral agreements between India and China prevent the use of weapons along the effective line of control; But these skirmishes saw the first shots fired, warning shots fired in decades. [127] [128] Clearly, China has reversed the situation in India. China used to take a long-term view and had outsmarted India when the 1993 agreement was signed. To understand the enormity of the marsh in which India is now located today, it is important to remember exactly how the 1993 LAC came about and what prompted India to sign a line without delimiting or delimiting it. As can be seen from the current crisis in Ladakh, Indian diplomacy has been neglected, to put it politely. Driven by its military might, Chinese diplomacy depends on a show of force and does not have time to conclude bilateral agreements or agree.
She will do what she wants based on what she can do. Because the distance at which the hat is thrown depends on the strength of the launcher`s hands. As the Ladakh crisis is always longer than expected, the Hutu ananalogy sums up India`s dilemma. Regardless of how the negotiations between India and China are conducted, two glaring realities are evident: the existing diplomatic framework, created by the 1993 Peace and Quiet Agreement to contain volatility along the effective line of control (LAC), has been put overboard by China. In addition, the illusion of the Indian army`s two-fronted war capability, created in 2009, has been shattered. A reset is required. This means that the demilitarized buffer zone between the 1993 LAC and China`s traditional claim lines would be located on Indian territory. This proposal, according to the sources, was officially declared by China, and perhaps explained the paradoxical statement of the Minister of Defense, Rajnath Singh, on July 17. While assuring the soldiers that „no inch of our country can be taken by any power in the world,” he expressed uncertainty about how to „solve the case.” Sushant Singhsushant.singh@expressindia.com…
